02.06.2025New publication by Dorothea Chatzikonstantinou & Dr. Alice Cavolo

This paper reviewed the ethical arguments on Artificial Womb Technology (AWT) in relation to abortion, offering a better understanding of the current debate. We conducted a systematic review of the ethical literature. Forty-eight articles met the predefined inclusion criteria out of 2133 screened. We identified four questions in the literature. First, how could AWT affect viability thresholds, currently used to regulate abortion access in some jurisdictions? Second, should AWT substitute abortion? Some support a substitution because it will allow to terminate the pregnancy and preserve the fetus. Others believe that abortion should be available regardless of AWT. The rights to autonomy, not to be a biological parent, to genetic privacy and to property were used in this discussion. Third, who is entitled to decide whether and how to terminate a pregnancy when AWT is available? The pregnant person alone or both parents should consent? Fourth, what are the practical implications of substituting abortion e.g. for the care management of ‘AWT infants’ in the adoption system? We concluded that the debate should focus more on the real implications of substituting abortion with the AWT currently in development. Authors supporting an abortion substitution should be more realistic when describing the consequences of their arguments. Continue reading